Sunday, October 9, 2016

stochastic calculus - Girsanov Theorem for Quanto/Compo adjustment


Assume that I have a foreign asset Yt=Y0exp((rf12σ2Y)t+σYW1t)

and an exchange rate Xt=X0exp((rdrf12σ2X)t+σXW2t)


I would like to compute the expectation of YtXt under the domestic rsik-neutral market measure. I know I would like to use Girsanov, but am not sure how to approach this.


My ultimate goal would then be to extend the workings to Y2tXt or X2tYt or X2tY2t etc. so this change of measure would be useful to me



Answer



Assume deterministic and constant interest rates.


For an investor in the foreign economy i.e. a market participant that can only trade assets delivering a payout in the foreign currency, let us define


˜Xt=˜X0exp((rfrdσ2˜X2)+σ˜XW˜X,Qft)



Yt=Y0exp(((rfσ2Y2)t+σYWY,Qft)

where



  • Qf figures the foreign risk-neutral measure (risk-free MMA Bft=exp(rf t) is the numéraire).

  • ˜Xt representing the instantaneous DOM/FOR exchange rate. ˜Xt=x means that, at time t, 1 unit of domestic currency equals x units of foreign currency.

  • Yt an equity underlying denominated in the foreign currency.


Let's further assume that the 2 Brownian motions W˜X,Qft and WY,Qft are correlated dW˜X,Qf,WY,Qft=ρdt


Notice how I have used ˜Xt (DOM/FOR) and not Xt (FOR/DOM) as you propose, because in the foreign economy, the only tradable assets are: Yt, Bft and Bdt˜Xt as hinted above (and these should be all Qf-martingales when expressed under the numéraire Bft). We do have the relationship, ˜Xt=1/Xt.


Thanks to the fundamental theorem of asset pricing, for any tradable asset Vt denominated in the foreign currency, we have that, under the foreign risk-neutral measure Qf


VtBft is a Qf- martingaleV0Bf0=EQf0[VtBft]



Under the domestic risk-neutral measure Qd (risk-free MMA Bdt=exp(rd t) is the numéraire)


Vt/˜XtBdt is a Qd- martingaleV0/˜X0Bd0=EQd0[Vt/˜XdtBdt]

in words, the foreign asset value converted to domestic currency units is a martingale under the domestic risk-neutral measure.


From the above, we see that the Radon-Nikodym derivative writes dQddQf|F0=Bf0Bdt˜XtBftBd0˜X0

yet because ˜Xt=˜X0exp((rfrd12σ2˜X)t+σ˜XW˜X,Qft)=˜X0BftBf0Bd0Bdtexp(12σ2˜Xt+σ˜XW˜X,Qft)


this deriative also writes dQddQf|F0=exp(σ˜XW˜X,Qft12σ2˜Xt)=E(σ˜XW˜X,Qft)

which is indeed a well-behaved Doléans-Dade exponential where we've used the notation E(Mt)=exp(Mt12Mt)
to denote the stochastic exponential.


Hence Girsanov theorem can be applied to transform Brownian motions under Qf as Brownian motions under Qd. How does it work?



Girsanov Theorem (non rigourous version) - Let WQft represent a standard Brownian motion under Qf and assume the Radon-Nikodym derivative can be written as: dQddQf|F0=E(Lt)

In that case, the process WQdt defined as WQdt=WQftWQf,Lt
is a standard a Brownian motion under Qd.



In our particular example, we see that Lt:=σ˜XW˜X,Qft


Applying Girsanov theorem then allows us to write W˜X,Qdt=W˜X,QftW˜X,Qf,σ˜XW˜X,Qft=W˜X,Qftσ˜XtWY,Qdt=WY,QftWY,Qf,σ˜XW˜X,Qft=WY,Qftρσ˜Xt

meaning that, to move from Qf to Qd one can just replace W˜X,Qft=W˜X,Qdt+σ˜XtWY,Qft=WY,Qdt+ρσ˜Xt
in the expressions for ˜Xt and Yt to obtain: ˜Xt=˜X0exp((rfrd+σ2˜X2)t+σ˜XW˜X,Qdt)Yt=Y0exp((rf+ρσ˜XσYσ2Y2)t+σYWY,Qdt)



Now assume we want to compute the expectation of YtXt=Yt/˜Xt under Qd. The random variable Yt/˜Xt being lognormally distributed (ratio of two lognormals) with mean μ=ln(Y0/˜X0)+(rdσ2X2ρσ˜XσY+σ2Y2)t

and variance σ2=(σ2˜X2ρσ˜XσY+σ2Y)t
applying the usual formula gives EQd[Yt/˜Xt]=exp(μ+σ22)=Y0/˜X0exp(rdt)=Y0/˜X0Bdt
hence EQd[Yt/˜XtBdt]=Y0/˜X0Bd0
as it should since we already knew that Yt/˜XtBdt was a Qd- martingale




For quanto derivatives we prefer to express the equity/forex dynamics in terms of Xt the FOR/DOM exchange rate instead of the DOM/FOR exchange rate ˜Xt. This can be done through a simple application of Itô's lemma noticing that ˜Xt=1/Xt. This would typically yield: dXtXt=(rdrf)dt+σXdWX,QdtdYtYt=(rfρXYσXσY)dt+σYdWY,Qdt

where we have introduced WX,Qdt=W˜X,Qdt
such that WX,Qdt,WY,Qdtt=ρXYt=ρt
and we used σX=σ˜X for clarity.


Hence finally, under Qd we can write:


Xt=X0exp((rdrfσ2X2)+σXWX,Qdt)


Yt=Y0exp((rfρXYσXσYσ2Y2)t+σYWY,Qdt)


where the quantity F(0,t)=EQd0[Yt]=Y0exp((rfρXYσXσY)t)

is known as the quanto forward.


and it is once again easy to show that YtXtBdt is a Qd- martingale

using the fact that Z=YtXt is a product of lognormals (and not a ratio as before)


No comments:

Post a Comment

technique - How credible is wikipedia?

I understand that this question relates more to wikipedia than it does writing but... If I was going to use wikipedia for a source for a res...