Thursday, April 27, 2017

fixed income - Stochastic Leibniz rule


We have the following single-factor HJM model dtf(t,T)=σ(t,T)dWt+α(t,T)dt

f(t,T)=f(0,T)+t0σ(s,T)dWs+t0α(s,T)ds
The discounted T bond is then Z(t,T)=exp(T0f(0,u)du+t0Tsσ(s,u)dudWs+t0Tsα(s,u)duds)=exp(T0f(0,u)du+t0Tsσ(s,u)duΣ(s,T)dWst0Tsα(s,u)duds)
By Ito's Lemma dtZ(t,T)=Z(t,T)((12Σ2(t,T)Ttα(t,u)du)dt+Σ(t,T)dWt)
My question is, how was Ito's Lemma applied to the term t0Tsσ(s,u)dudWs, which contains an integral of Brownian motion?


Claus Munk's Fixed Income Modelling proves the following stochastic Leibniz rule on page 57-58 Yt=Ttf(0,u)du+Ttt0α(s,u)dsdu+Ttt0σ(s,u)dWsdu

dYt=(Ttα(t,u)duf(t,t))dt+(Ttσ(t,u)du)dWt
however due to the different limits in the integrals, I am unable to extrapolate from Munk's example to solve my question.


Any help is appreciated.




No comments:

Post a Comment

technique - How credible is wikipedia?

I understand that this question relates more to wikipedia than it does writing but... If I was going to use wikipedia for a source for a res...