Sunday, April 1, 2018

correlation - Cleansing covariance matrices via Random matrix theory


I am exploring de-noising and cleansing of covariance matrices via Random Matrix Theory. RMT is a competitor to shrinkage methods of covariance estimation. There are various methods expressed usually by the names of the authors: LPCB, PG+, and so on.


For each method, one can start by filtering the covariance matrix directly, or filter the correlation matrix and then covert the cleansed correlation matrix into a covariance matrix. My question involves the latter case.


I have noticed that when cleaning a correlation matrix that the resulting diagonal is not a diagonal of 1s (as one would expect to see in a correlation matrix).


My question -- when constructing a cleansed covariance matrix by first filtering its corresponding correlation matrix, does one:




  1. "Fix" the diagonals of the intermediate cleansed correlation matrix to a diagonal of 1s before finally converting it back to a covariance matrix? This seems to be the case with the PG+ method, but not the LPCB method.





  2. Or does one convert the cleansed correlation matrix to a covariance matrix and then fix the diagonal of the resulting covariance matrix to the diagonal of the original covariance matrix?




In both cases the trace is preserved.



Answer



I tested both procedures. The results are virtually indistinguishable - the decision is not consequential. I opted for approach #1.


No comments:

Post a Comment

technique - How credible is wikipedia?

I understand that this question relates more to wikipedia than it does writing but... If I was going to use wikipedia for a source for a res...