Saturday, August 13, 2016

copyright - How do co-authors' rights to a manuscript work?


When an individual writes a novel, he owns all rights over the manuscript until he starts selling those rights to others.


What is the situation when the novel is a collaborative work? How are such rights as "first publication rights" and "movie rights" defined when the rights are held jointly by two individual authors? Obviously a duo can determine an individual agreement, but my question is what the "default" definition of the rights are absent a formal agreement.


Additionally, I would like to know whether on the death of one author, the rights are considered to revert to the collaborator, or to the author's estate. I could see strong intuitive cases in both directions, and would like to know what the ruling is in practice.




Answer



Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. This is a complicated area of law, but I'll give you the 30,000 foot view to get you started.


By default (at least, under U.S. law), each co-author owns an equal interest in the work's copyright. This is irrespective of how much (or how little) each co-author contributed to the work. So, absent of any agreement, if there are two authors, the split is 50/50, thirds for three authors, and so on.


For someone who collaborates on a work to be considered an "author," his contribution must be independently copyrightable. That means:




  • Someone who designs illustrations with the intent that they should be used in a specific book is a co-author (graphics designs are copyrightable)




  • Someone who composes the music for a song, or writes its lyrics, is a co-author (music and lyrics are copyrightable)





  • Someone who comes up with the general idea for a screenplay is not a co-author (ideas are not copyrightable)




  • Someone who researches population statistics for a geography textbook is not a co-author (facts are not copyrightable)




  • Someone who invents the algorithm for a new search engine (but does not write the actual computer code) is not a co-author (algorithms are non-copyrightable processes)





Each co-author can exploit the work in any way they seem fit (license the work, create derivative works, etc.), but they have to split all the profits with the other co-authors in equal parts. A co-author does not need to seek permission from the other co-author(s) to use the work, and likewise, a co-author cannot prevent the other co-author(s) from using the work.


An exception is the grant of an exclusive license, which requires the consent of all co-authors.


Co-authors' shares of a copyright are property interests that pass to their respective heirs.


References:



No comments:

Post a Comment

technique - How credible is wikipedia?

I understand that this question relates more to wikipedia than it does writing but... If I was going to use wikipedia for a source for a res...