Sunday, April 2, 2017

"The drift of stock price becomes the risk-free interest rate" under RNP


Assume that the evolution of a stock price is geometric Brownian Motion


dS=μSdt+σSdW(t)


where S is the stock price at time t (current time). It says in my book that "under the risk-neutral probability measure, the drift of stock price μ becomes the risk-free interest rate r" and it writes


dS=rSdt+σSdW(t).

where W is a B.M. under RNP Q (risk neutral probability).


Is the above equation definitely correct? Is there a justification for this?



Answer



Yes, you may as well take this as the definition of the risk-neutral probability Q.


I will now try to give you some intuition for that kind of construction.



Assume the risk-free interest rate r is constant and that the world ends at time T. Suppose you have a security B=Bt which is riskless, i.e. which follows the dynamics dB/B=rdt

so that, since dB/B=dlnB, you can easily see that Bt=B0ert. In other words, the process Bt grows at the same speed of the risk-free rate. For this security, the price at time zero is B0, which coincides with the discounted value of its expected payoff: erTE[BT]=erTE[B0erT]=erTB0erT=B0.


Now consider a stock which is risky, as it follows the dynamics dS/S=μdt+σdW

with μ>r and σ constant and dW, a standard Brownian Motion, being the source of risk. This time the process S grows in expectation with speed μ, and its discounted expected payoff erTE[ST]=erTS0eμT=S0e(μr)T>S0
is bigger that its current value S0. Why is it so? Well, because there's some risk involved in holding S, so that its price should be lower w.r.t. a riskless security! This way the investor who buys the stock at time 0 will be compensated for bearing this risk, i.e. he will pocket a risk premium. The risk-neutral probability Q is the one which gives the right price when you look at the discounted expected payoff, i.e. S0=erTEQ[ST].
If you followed my reasoning so far, it should now be clear that Q is that probability for which dS/S=rdt+σdWQ
with dWQ being a Brownian Motion under Q.


No comments:

Post a Comment

technique - How credible is wikipedia?

I understand that this question relates more to wikipedia than it does writing but... If I was going to use wikipedia for a source for a res...