Monday, October 19, 2015

publishing - Should authors write books anticipating audiobook narrations?


With the surge of audiobooks popularity and the dramatization of fiction and non-fiction recitations, do authors plan for their books to publish their work as audiobooks too?


Additionally, if an author knows his book will be made into an audiobook, how does this knowledge alter the writing process? Does it affect the dialogue, narration POV, character casting, and the general format of the book? For instance, Sleeping Giants, by Sylvain Neuvel is a well-written story in an interview format conducted by the MC. I think this enabled the audiobook to feel a lot more like a radio show than a book.


Furthermore, do audiobooks imply more constraints on proofreaders, editors, and publishers?



Answer



Audiobooks impose certain restrictions on your writing. Here are some things you need to watch out for:




  • Homographs or homophone jokes or dramatic misunderstandings. If words are pronounced differently, the joke does not translate to audio. On the other hand, If your character confuses a word for its homophone and you keep using the "wrong" spelling to reflect the character's confusion and mislead the reader, the ruse won't hold for long in the audio version.





  • Backwards names (hard) and anagrams (impossible).




  • Proper nouns which sound like common nouns.




  • Unpronounceable things (e.g. a number sequence to simulate a computer glitch, an inscription in a foreign language).





  • Acronyms which are pronounced letter by letter.




  • Scientific or fictional sci-fi terms. The listener can't look up a word s/he can't spell, and it's harder to connect a made-up term to real terms by ear.




  • Sound effects. Suppose your protagonist is locked in a dungeon. The narration conveys her train of thought, interrupted at random intervals by drops of water. Cliche but effective in children's fiction. Now suppose it's an audiobook and the narrator vocalizes [drɪp].





  • Direct speech and thoughts. Suppose your character says one thing but immediately thinks the opposite - how'd that work? If you have several voice actors for characters and one for narration, who does the trains of thought?




  • Other formatting. Extremely short paragraphs as a means of expression. ALL CAPS, fonts, columns, tables, codes, forms, artistically placed page breaks, colored pages, blank pages, footnotes, references, typography art.




  • Pictures, obviously.




  • Ambiguous emphasis (artistic, or as a plot point). It's not ambiguous if you say it out loud.





  • The ability to easily go back and look up things is pretty much required for solving a mystery to be an achievement for both the audience and the protagonists, and losing it kills most if not all "fair" mysteries.




Should you anticipate an audiobook narration? This is up to you. Personally, I am thoroughly convinced an artwork that aspires to greatness should not tolerate a direct transfer to another medium by definition. Alan Moore's comics feature fake ad pages for in-universe products. Julian May's Pliocene Exile series uses wonderfully typeset vignettes to portray psychic powers. Peter Darvill-Evans' Spectral Stalkers uses page-turning as a special effect to convey its main idea.


When I write, I want Linux usernames to be in lowercase. I want cursive and vignettes and cthulhutext and line breaks. I want page numbers to suddenly start counting down to the pivotal event. I want section signs and cartouches and places of Sajdah. CMOS be damned, I want to end sentences with a dash. When I write, I want to make the best book. Adapting all the above to audio, or Braille, or Netflix series, or interpretive dance is simply not my job.


No comments:

Post a Comment

technique - How credible is wikipedia?

I understand that this question relates more to wikipedia than it does writing but... If I was going to use wikipedia for a source for a res...