Friday, August 18, 2017

creative writing - How to write a Complete Monster?


For those of you who are unfamiliar with TV Tropes lingo, a Complete Monster is the worst kind of villain imaginable: one that is evil to the core and has little to no redeeming traits whatsoever.


In order to qualify as a Complete Monster, a villain has to meet the following criteria:





  1. They are the vilest character in their respective universe and must stand out from the crowd of other villains.




  2. They are taken seriously, causing fear, revulsion, and hatred from other characters in the story.




  3. They are never presented in a positive way.




  4. They display no remorse towards those who they have hurt, nor do they express any empathy for others as well.





  5. The atrocities that they commit are shown to the audience or implied and must not be told.




  6. They must have performed an act that puts them beyond any chance of redemption.




I'm fully aware that it's quite easy for any writer to make a villain that is irredeemably terrible, bit it's hard to make such a villain come across as a believable character without making them into a one-dimensional caricature. One of the reasons I absolutely despise Sword Art Online is that every single Complete Monster in the series is a manic that is comically evil for the sake of being comically evil, who is either a megalomaniac, a rapist or an empty shell of a person with no motivation, except to kill. I've tried to avoid this problem by taking a page from Berserk and giving each Complete Monster in my series, The Ragnarǫk Cycle (which has no more than four CMs) their own distinct personalities and motives for villainy.


Would this be a good way to write a Complete Monster?




Answer



Your link gives many examples of such monsters, and I'm sure you'll be familiar with at least a few of them. In theory, you can take one you felt was especially interesting to watch/read/listen to depending on the medium, and list how they fit those six criteria.


But you can also list what else there is to them besides being CMs. When well-written, what makes someone a CM isn't what they want, but their willingness to do anything to get it and to Hell with the consequences. And even if they want something that can seem good, it's no problem; Davros thought the Daleks would achieve "peace" in the sense of destroying everyone else.


Decide what it is that your character wants. Money? Power? Revenge? To change the world as they see fit? They're likely to pretend they want A when they care at least as much about B, which further underscores their flaws.


No comments:

Post a Comment

technique - How credible is wikipedia?

I understand that this question relates more to wikipedia than it does writing but... If I was going to use wikipedia for a source for a res...