How to derive an analytic formula of greeks for binary option?
We know a vanilla option can be constructed by an asset-or-nothing call and a cash-or-nothing call, does that help us?
Wikipedia states
Since a binary call is a mathematical derivative of a vanilla call with respect to strike, the price of a binary call has the same shape as the delta of a vanilla call, and the delta of a binary call has the same shape as the gamma of a vanilla call.
Does that mean the delta of a binary call is also the gamma of a vanilla call? Can we use the analytical formula for gamma of vanilla call for binary option?
Answer
For a digital option with payoff 1ST>K, note that, for ε>0 sufficiently small, 1ST>K≈(ST−(K−ε))+−(ST−K)+−ε. That is, The value of the digital option D(S0,T,K,σ)=−dC(S0,T,K,σ)dK, where C(S0,T,K,σ) is the call option price with payoff (ST−K)+. Here, we use d rather than ∂ to emphasize the full derivative.
If we ignore the skew or smile, that is, the volatility σ does not depend on the strike K, then D(S0,T,K,σ)=−dC(S0,T,K,σ)dK=N(d2)=N(d1−σ√T). That is, the digital option price has the same shape as the corresponding call option delta N(d1). Similarly, the digital option delta ∂N(d1−σ√T)∂S0 has the same shape as the call option gamma ∂N(d1)∂S0. Here, we note that they have the same shape, but they are not the same.
However, if we take the volatility skew into consideration, the above conclusion does not hold. Specifically, D(S0,T,K,σ)=−dC(S0,T,K,σ)dK=−∂C(S0,T,K,σ)∂K−∂C(S0,T,K,σ)∂σ∂σ∂K=N(d2)−∂C(S0,T,K,σ)∂σ∂σ∂K, which may not have the same shape as N(d2)=N(d1−σ√T). In this case, we prefer to value the digital option using the call-spread approximation given by (1) above instead of the analytical formula (2) or (3).
No comments:
Post a Comment