Wednesday, August 23, 2017

Greeks for binary option?


How to derive an analytic formula of greeks for binary option?


We know a vanilla option can be constructed by an asset-or-nothing call and a cash-or-nothing call, does that help us?



Wikipedia states



Since a binary call is a mathematical derivative of a vanilla call with respect to strike, the price of a binary call has the same shape as the delta of a vanilla call, and the delta of a binary call has the same shape as the gamma of a vanilla call.



Does that mean the delta of a binary call is also the gamma of a vanilla call? Can we use the analytical formula for gamma of vanilla call for binary option?



Answer



For a digital option with payoff 1ST>K, note that, for ε>0 sufficiently small, 1ST>K(ST(Kε))+(STK)+ε. That is, The value of the digital option D(S0,T,K,σ)=dC(S0,T,K,σ)dK, where C(S0,T,K,σ) is the call option price with payoff (STK)+. Here, we use d rather than to emphasize the full derivative.


If we ignore the skew or smile, that is, the volatility σ does not depend on the strike K, then D(S0,T,K,σ)=dC(S0,T,K,σ)dK=N(d2)=N(d1σT). That is, the digital option price has the same shape as the corresponding call option delta N(d1). Similarly, the digital option delta N(d1σT)S0 has the same shape as the call option gamma N(d1)S0. Here, we note that they have the same shape, but they are not the same.


However, if we take the volatility skew into consideration, the above conclusion does not hold. Specifically, D(S0,T,K,σ)=dC(S0,T,K,σ)dK=C(S0,T,K,σ)KC(S0,T,K,σ)σσK=N(d2)C(S0,T,K,σ)σσK, which may not have the same shape as N(d2)=N(d1σT). In this case, we prefer to value the digital option using the call-spread approximation given by (1) above instead of the analytical formula (2) or (3).


No comments:

Post a Comment

technique - How credible is wikipedia?

I understand that this question relates more to wikipedia than it does writing but... If I was going to use wikipedia for a source for a res...