I have an FX process Xt=X0exp((rd−rf)t+σWt). Now clearly E[X_t] = F_{0,t}^X. i.e. a forward contract of the process X starting at time 0 and maturing at time t.
What if I want to look at a forward contract at a later date. i.e. F_{a,b}^X. Where $0 < a
Answer
[Question 1]
Let us define \begin{align} X_t &= X_0 \exp((r_d-r_f-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2)t + \sigma W_t) \\ &= X_0 \exp((r_d-r_f)t) \mathcal{E}(\sigma W_t) \end{align} then, in that case E(X_t \vert \mathcal{F}_0) = X_0 \exp((r_d-r_f)t) = F^X(0,t) only because \mathcal{E}(\sigma W_t) is a stochastic exponential (strictly positive martingale with mean 1).
Yet E(X_t \vert \mathcal{F}_0) \ne F^X(0,t) for X_t = X_0 \exp((r_d-r_f)t + \sigma W_t) as you define it in your question.
[Question 2]
Under the domestic risk-neutral measure, the dynamics of the FOR/DOM (1 unit of foreign currency expressed in domestic currency) exchange rate X_t should write (to preclude arbitrage opportunities) \frac{dX_t}{X_t} = (r_d - r_f)dt + \sigma W_t Applying Itô, to the function f(t,X_t)=\ln(X_t) gives d\ln(X_t) = (r_d - r_f - \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2)dt + \sigma W_t which one can easily integrate e.g. from t_1 to t_2 (assuming 0 < t_1 < t_2 < T) to obtain \ln(X_{t_2}) - \ln(X_{t_1}) = (r_d - r_f - \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2)(t_2-t_1) + \sigma (W_{t_2}-W_{t_1}) or equivalently X_{t_2} = X_{t_1} \exp \left( (r_d - r_f - \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2)(t_2-t_1) + \sigma (W_{t_2}-W_{t_1}) \right)
From the above the forward FOR/DOM exchange rate at t_1 with maturity t_2 computes as \begin{align} F^X(t_1,t_2) &= E\left[ X_{t_2} \vert \mathcal{F}_{t_1} \right] \\ &= X_{t_1} \exp \left( (r_d - r_f)(t_2 - t_1) \right) \end{align}
[Edit] \begin{align} E_0 \left[ F^X(t_1,t_2) \right] &= E_0 \left[ X_{t_1} \exp \left( (r_d - r_f)(t_2 - t_1) \right) \right] \\ &= E_0 \left[ X_{t_1} \right] \exp \left( (r_d - r_f)(t_2 - t_1) \right) \\ &= F(0,t_1) \exp \left( (r_d - r_f)(t_2 - t_1) \right) \\ &= X_0 \exp \left( (r_d - r_f) t_1 \right) \exp \left( (r_d - r_f)(t_2 - t_1) \right) \\ &= F(0,t_2) \end{align}
this is only normal since E [ X_{t_2} \vert \mathcal{F}_0 ] = F(0,t_2) = E[ E[ X_{t_2} \vert \mathcal{F}_{t_1}] \vert \mathcal{F}_0] by the tower integral property.
No comments:
Post a Comment