Friday, December 11, 2015

email - Is the sign-up, wait for auth, log-in process the best way to capture user data?


Currently my user flow looks like this:



  1. User visits landing page


  2. User realizes the content of the site is locked behind authorization, only way to get in is to sign-up

  3. User signs-up (with just an email)

  4. User receives log-in information

  5. User returns to website to log-in and view content


I'm worried that the sign-up has added too many bureaucratic layers to get to the content. So far to manage this, I've tried to turn around on #3 as fast as possible, but am still worried that by the time #4 happens, the user's interest has already deflated and they no longer do #5. What have other studies/ experiences shown?


For context, I absolutely want some mechanism to capture the user's email. I've thought about a potential alternative as:



  1. User visits landing page

  2. User enters email and hits submit


  3. User sees content


The challenge with this flow is that, although it's shorter and gives me the email, users will forever have to enter email to access content. Unlike the sign-in approach, where the password could easily be saved by the system.



Answer



A book I really found helpful for this topic is Seductive Interaction Design. It deals with the many ways we can keep the user invested in our content while we get the information from them that we need. Studies show that people who have made a very small commitment are psychologically more likely to agree to a bigger (and more inconvenient) similar commitment than those asked to make the large commitment straight away. Perhaps you can give temporary access to the site (a few pages) and then prompt them to sign up. Another way might be to have a very minimal signup that gives temporary access without going back to their email, but revoke the access if they don't complete registration.


No comments:

Post a Comment

technique - How credible is wikipedia?

I understand that this question relates more to wikipedia than it does writing but... If I was going to use wikipedia for a source for a res...