Tuesday, December 22, 2015

What is the significance of Relative Risk Aversion


I know that the relative risk aversion is defined as R(c)=cA(c)=cu(c)u(c)

where u(c) denotes the utility curve as a function of wealth c.


But I do not understand the intuition for it. Can you explain the intuition for relative risk aversion?



Answer



In utility theory the basic assumption is that u(c) is strictly monotonically increasing in wealth: people prefer more over less. Hence, c,u(c)>0. The second assumption is that the amount of utility added, as c increases, diminishes, so c,u(c)<0. Combining these two observations we have that c,A(c)=u(c)u(c)>0.


This can be interpreted as follows, if for a particular c u(c) is large A(c) will be small. Thus if utility curve is sensitive to increases in wealth the risk aversion is low. For u(c) the reverse holds: if u(c) for a particular value of c risk aversion will be low. A(c) captures both sensitivities and also produces some kind of a trade-off between them.


The quantity R(c) is just A(c) scaled by the wealth. This scaling has the advantage that this quantity is not sensitive to a change in numéraire of c.



By the way, the Wikipedia page is excellent.


No comments:

Post a Comment

technique - How credible is wikipedia?

I understand that this question relates more to wikipedia than it does writing but... If I was going to use wikipedia for a source for a res...