Saturday, March 5, 2016

options - Gamma is always positive on both put and call



I recently met the claim that for standard put and calls the gamma of the options are always positive. Is this a general result?


I am hoping not to assume any model, especially not Black-Scholes.



Answer



I'll use a European call option as an example, I think you can easily generalize it for a put option.


Given underlying S(t)=St, maturity T, strike K and risk-free rate r, the price of a call option as time t under the rik-neutral measure Q is


C(t,St)=EQ[er(Tt)max


where \mathbb{1}_{S_T \geq K} is a function values 1 when S_T \geq K and 0 otherwise. For the first expectation, we can change the probability measure to make it more manageable. Call P the new measure; the Radon-Nikodym derivative between the P and Q is


dQ = \frac{S_t}{S_T} e^{r(T-t)} dP


Therefore you get


\begin{align} C(t, S_t) & = e^{-r(T-t)} \mathbb{E}^Q \left[ S_T \cdot \mathbb{1}_{S_T \geq K} \right] - K e^{-r(T-t)} \mathbb{E}^Q \left[ \mathbb{1}_{S_T \geq K} \right] \\ & = e^{-r(T-t)} \mathbb{E}^P \left[ S_T \cdot \mathbb{1}_{S_T \geq K} \cdot \frac{S_t}{S_T} e^{r(T-t)} \right] - K e^{-r(T-t)} \mathbb{E}^Q \left[ \mathbb{1}_{S_T \geq K} \right] \\ & = e^{-r(T-t)} \mathbb{E}^P \left[ \mathbb{1}_{S_T \geq K} S_t e^{r(T-t)} \right] - K e^{-r(T-t)} \mathbb{E}^Q \left[ \mathbb{1}_{S_T \geq K} \right] \\ & = S_t \mathbb{E}^P \left[ \mathbb{1}_{S_T \geq K} \right] - K e^{-r(T-t)} \mathbb{E}^Q \left[ \mathbb{1}_{S_T \geq K} \right] \\ \end{align}



Expanding the expectations as integrals you get:


\begin{align} C(t, S_t) & = S_t \int_K^{\infty} f^P(S_T) dS_T - K e^{-r(T-t)} \int_K^{\infty} f^Q(S_T) dS_T \\ & = S_t P_1 - K e^{-r(T-t)} P_2 \end{align}


where P_1, P_2 highlight that the integrals are probabilities.


Now the Greeks:


\begin{align} \Delta & = \frac{\partial C}{\partial S_t} = \int_K^{\infty} f^P(S_T) dS_T = P_1 \\ \Gamma & = \frac{\partial^2 C}{\partial S_t} = \frac{\partial \Delta}{\partial S_t} = f^P(S_t) \frac{\partial f^P(S_t)}{\partial S_t} \\ \end{align}


The derivative in \Gamma is the key. I don't think you can prove \Gamma to be positive for any probability density (i.e. any model).


No comments:

Post a Comment

technique - How credible is wikipedia?

I understand that this question relates more to wikipedia than it does writing but... If I was going to use wikipedia for a source for a res...