Friday, July 19, 2019

web app - upgrade-friendly visual treatment for features disabled in the free version of a freemium product


My company is preparing to launch a "freemium" web application for business users. Most of the surface area of the app will be enabled in the free version, but a few features (e.g. ability to assign different permissions to different users, filtering by branch office for multi-branch customers, advanced reporting, integration with other business software, etc.) will be disabled in the free version.


Instead of totally hiding those disabled features in the free version's user interface, I'd like to leave them in place as ways to educate free users about features they're missing, hopefully enticing some free users to upgrade and reducing training time after upgrades because users will already know where paid features live in the app.


What would be a good visual treatment for controls (mostly dropdown boxes, buttons, and menu navigation links) to convey that each:




  1. is disabled

  2. can be enabled by upgrading

  3. can be clicked on to find out more informaton about this feature

  4. (longer-term) might have a way to turn on the feature temporarily to try it out


Also, is anyone familiar with apps that have successfully implemented this kind of "see what you're missing!" UX without seeing overly crass and commercial?



Answer



One approach is to keep the premium features intentionally enabled, so that the user can play around with them. However, if the user finally wants to save or print the results in any way, this is to be disallowed. This way the user can convince himself that the premium features work as promised, but he can't work efficiently until they are completely unlocked.


You can also restrict the amount of data the user is allowed to work with, e.g. a limited set of users can be edited, statistics can be generated only for up to 20 rows of data, etc. In doing so, the user gets familiar with the features too.



I think this way the user is more tempted to upgrade than by greying out some features and compensating this with context-related descriptions.


No comments:

Post a Comment

technique - How credible is wikipedia?

I understand that this question relates more to wikipedia than it does writing but... If I was going to use wikipedia for a source for a res...