Views on timeframes for backtesting vary considerably. Curious on what timeframe/trade size leads to a statistically significant result. For example, what backtest period is reasonable for a system that trades roundtrip once per day and results in ~250 trades per year? Two years, five years, ten years? Intuitively I struggle with problem because market character/direction also impacts a strategies performance which can span multiple years and so that would suggest the test should span multiple bull and bear markets among other things. So trying to find a reasonable balance that is practical but also statistically significant.
Thursday, July 4, 2019
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
technique - How credible is wikipedia?
I understand that this question relates more to wikipedia than it does writing but... If I was going to use wikipedia for a source for a res...
-
I've been tasked with drafting the text for a memorial plaque dedicated to group X. Group X was big, diverse, and had several hundred ye...
-
If all fields in a form are required should they be marked somehow (eg. with an asterisk)? I see this done a lot and find it redundant? Ther...
-
In microsoft word, for paragraph formatting, you have this option: "Don't add space between paragraphs of the same style" Is t...
No comments:
Post a Comment