I'm currently taking a course in Financial Econometrics and there is a question in the lecture notes regarding back-testing of VaR which I'm have difficulty with.
First of all the procedure for back-testing of VaR using a rolling scheme is described as follows:
assume we have returns data rt,t=1,...,T for some large enough T. We take the first 60 observations and calculate their sample mean μ1−60 and variance σ21−60 and then calculate: VaR1−60(α)=−μ1−60+Φ−1(α)⋅σ1−60
Now for the actual question, suppose rt,t=1,...,T are the returns using a WML investment strategy (momentum trading strategy). Is the procedure described above suitable for testing the VaR in such a case and if not why?
Usually the phrasing of the question would hint towards there being some sort of problem with using the procedure in such a case but I don't see why that would be the case... Help would very much be appreciated!
Answer
What you could do is to apply the methods of portfolio risk analysis. If you buy n stocks with percentages wi,i=1,…,n then your portfolio return is r=∑ni=1wiri.
Dealing with investment strategies I would not include an expected profit in the VaR calculation and put μ=0 for this reason.
To calculate the volatility of your portfolio you can do the following:
- calculate the covariance matrix of your assets on the past N (e.g. 60) days, Σ
- caclulate portfolio ex-ante volatility by σ=√wΣwT.
You ca plug this σ into your formula and proceed. This is the basis set-up, assumptions about the dependence of the assets or the distributions of asset returns can improve the risk analysis.
IMPORTANT addon:
- the formulae above are valid for negative weigths too. All you have to do is to determine a cash basis from which you calculate the weights. Say you have 50000 cash, buy a stock for 25000 and sell one for 25000 then you have 100% cash and weights of +50% and −50%.
No comments:
Post a Comment