Question: The Black-Scholes equation without dividend is given by ∂V∂t+12σ2S2∂2V∂S2+rS∂V∂S−rV=0.
(I attempted to derive the equation in my previous post.)
If we assume that 'with dividend rate D', then the Black-Scholes equation becomes ∂V∂t+12σ2S2∂2V∂S2+(r−D)S∂V∂S−rV=0.
How to derive this?
By working backwards and assuming derivation of my previous post, we should have dΠ=∂V∂tdt+∂V∂SdS+12σ2S2∂2V∂S2dt−ΔS−DΔSdt.
But I do not understand why can we add the term in dΠ.
We assume that the stock price process {St,t>0} satisfies, under the real-world probability measure P, an SDE of the form dSt=St((μ−q)dt+σdWt),
where {Wt,t>0} is a standard Brownian motion. Here, we need to consider the total return asset eqtSt, that is, the asset with the dividend payments invested in the same underlying stock. We consider a locally risk-free self-financing portfolio of the form πt=Δ1t(eqtSt)+Δ2tVt,
where Vt is the option price. Then, dπt=Δ1td(eqtSt)+Δ2tdVt=Δ1teqt(qStdt+dSt)+Δ2t(∂V∂tdt+∂V∂SdSt+12∂2V∂S2σ2S2tdt)=[μΔ1teqtSt+Δ2t(∂V∂t+(μ−q)St∂V∂S+12∂2V∂S2σ2S2t)]dt+(σΔ1teqtSt+σΔ2tSt∂V∂S)dWt.
Since πt is locally risk-free, we assume that πt earns the risk-free interest rate r, that is, dπt=rπtdt,
Then, [μΔ1teqtSt+Δ2t(∂V∂t+(μ−q)St∂V∂S+12∂2V∂S2σ2S2t)]dt+(σΔ1teqtSt+σΔ2tSt∂V∂S)dWt=rπtdt.
Consequently, σΔ1teqtSt+σΔ2tSt∂V∂S=0,
and μeqtΔ1tSt+Δ2t(∂V∂t+(μ−q)St∂V∂S+12∂2V∂S2σ2S2t)=r(Δ1teqtSt+Δ2tVt).
From (1), Δ1t=−e−qtΔ2t∂V∂S.
Then, −μΔ2tSt∂V∂S+Δ2t(∂V∂t+(μ−q)St∂V∂S+12∂2V∂S2σ2S2t)=r(−Δ2tSt∂V∂S+Δ2tVt),
or Δ2t(∂V∂t−qSt∂V∂S+12∂2V∂S2σ2S2t)=rΔ2t(−∂V∂SSt+Vt).
Canceling the term Δ2t from both sides of (2), we obtain the Black–Scholes equation of the form ∂V∂t+(r−q)St∂V∂S+12∂2V∂S2σ2S2t−rV=0.
No comments:
Post a Comment